Implementing Effective Background Checks and Managing Legal Risks in Employment Decisions: A Case Study Analysis of Personally Yours

Photo by Giammarco Boscaro on Unsplash

The case study of a company named Personally Yours, founded by Sarah Winters in 1997, reveals significant HR management challenges as the company transitions from a small, family-run business to a medium-sized enterprise. This analysis addresses the company’s need for systematic background checks and the dilemma concerning the employment status of an existing employee, Jackson Tibbits, following revelations about his past criminal behavior.

This paper examines the critical issues surrounding background checks and employee management at Personally Yours, a personal assistant firm. It analyzes the implications of a past negligent hiring and the recent discovery of a long-term employee’s criminal history, offering a comprehensive approach to both preventive and corrective HR practices in line with legal and ethical standards.

Identification of Key and Underlying Issues

1. Lack of Comprehensive Background Checks: Initially, background checks were not uniformly conducted, posing risks given the sensitive nature of employee duties.
2. Legal and Ethical Implications of Employment Decisions: The discovery of Jackson Tibbits’ criminal record raises concerns about negligent retention and the legal ramifications of potential employment termination.

Discussion of Pertinent Facts

According to the case study written by Angela Hall (2009), we know that:

1. Employees at Personally Yours have direct contact with vulnerable populations, necessitating stringent background checks.
2. Jackson Tibbits, employed before the standardization of HR processes, has a criminal record that was undisclosed and unknown until recently.
3. The legal restrictions tied to Tibbits’ status as a registered sexual offender do not directly prohibit his current employment as a handyman, but pose ethical and reputational risks to the company.

Tentative Solutions and Implementation

Implementation of Universal Background Checks:

1. Protocol Development: Collaborate with legal experts to establish clear guidelines defining the scope of background checks, focusing on criminal history, particularly for roles involving vulnerable clients.
2. Execution: Use third-party services to conduct background checks for all current and future employees, ensuring compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and relevant state laws.

Decision Regarding Jackson Tibbits:

1. Consultation with Legal Counsel: Assess the legal implications of potential termination to avoid wrongful dismissal claims.
2. Ethical Consideration: Evaluate the safety and reputation risks versus the rights of rehabilitation and non-discrimination.
3. Decision: If termination is legally sound, proceed with sensitivity, offering support for transition; if retention is chosen, consider reassignment to roles with minimized client interaction, pending risk assessment.

Support for Solutions

Research underscores the importance of thorough background checks in protecting against negligent hiring liabilities (Smith, 2020). Additionally, eEmployment law experts emphasize balancing legal compliance with ethical considerations in handling employees with criminal backgrounds (Johnson, 2021; Martinez, 2022).

Follow-up and Contingency Plans

• Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular audits of the background check process and periodic reviews of employment decisions to ensure consistency and compliance.
• Contingency Measures: Development of a clear policy for addressing non-compliance and unforeseen issues arising from background checks or employment of individuals with criminal records.

Conclusion

This case study of Personally Yours highlights the imperative for robust HR practices that safeguard both the company and its clientele while adhering to legal and ethical standards. The proposed solutions not only aim to rectify past oversights but also to establish a proactive framework for future HR challenges.

References

Hall, A. (2009). Case Two: The Negligent Hiring/Retention Case. In Personally Yours: A Case Study Trilogy (pp. 7–8). essay, Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from https://my.uopeople.edu/pluginfile.php/1844002/mod_workshop/instructauthors/Personally%20Yours%20SHRM.pdf.

Johnson, L. (2021). Employment Law for Business. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Martinez, D. (2022). Background Checks in the Workplace: Navigating Legal Landscapes and Ethical Practices. HR Professionals Magazine, 12(5), 20–23.

Smith, A. (2020). HR Management in the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(3), 673–687.

Note:
This article is written based on University of The People Human Resource Management (BUS 5511) written assignment by Fristy Tania Sato in May 2024