Transformative Leadership: A Solution for Enhancing Workplace Dynamics in Case 45

Photo by Alexandre Daoust on Unsplash

In the case study “The Worst Part Was That She Was Often Right,” Wanda faces challenges in managing Beverly, an employee whose accurate, yet confrontational approach is affecting team dynamics. While Beverly’s insights are valuable, her delivery creates tension (Case 45, n.d.). The analysis identifies leadership style incongruences and communication gaps as the primary issues. Drawing on transformational leadership principles, this paper proposes strategies to address these challenges effectively.

Key and Underlying Issues

The primary issue in this case is the leadership style conflict between Wanda and Beverly. Wanda’s inability to effectively manage Beverly’s confrontational, yet often correct criticisms points to a deeper issue of leadership adaptability and emotional intelligence. Underlying this is the organizational culture that may not foster open communication or provide mechanisms for healthy conflict resolution.

Pertinent Facts

• Beverly’s Strengths and Challenges: Beverly consistently identifies valid issues but presents them in a confrontational manner, which undermines her effectiveness and disrupts team harmony. For example, during a recent meeting, Beverly publicly challenged a colleague’s proposal, highlighting its flaws but offering no alternative solutions. This left the colleague feeling defensive and discouraged further participation.
• Wanda’s Leadership Style: Wanda’s current leadership approach lacks the flexibility to harness Beverly’s strengths and mitigate her disruptive impact. She tends to avoid conflict and may not provide clear feedback on Beverly’s communication style.

Proposed Solution: Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership could bridge the gap between Beverly’s confrontational style and the need for a harmonious team environment. This leadership style emphasizes motivation, inspiration, and positive development of followers, aligning well with the need to transform Beverly’s approach into a constructive force (Fiedler, 1967).

Implementation Strategy

1. Enhanced Communication Skills: Wanda should adopt open, frequent, and constructive communication strategies. This includes regular one-on-one meetings with Beverly to provide feedback in a constructive manner and discuss new ideas openly.
2. Recognition and Encouragement: Wanda should recognize Beverly’s contributions in a way that positively reinforces correct behaviors and gently redirects the negative ones. Celebrating Beverly’s successes in team meetings can enhance her self-efficacy and reduce confrontational behaviors.
3. Professional Development Opportunities: Providing Beverly with training on interpersonal skills and conflict resolution could help her refine her approach. Simultaneously, Wanda should participate in leadership development programs to enhance her adaptability and conflict management skills.
4. Creating a Participative Environment: Encourage team brainstorming sessions where all members, including Beverly, can voice their opinions in a structured and respectful manner. This participative approach can help Beverly feel valued and part of the team, reducing confrontational tendencies.

Follow-Up and Contingency Plans

• Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish clear metrics to assess the improvement in team dynamics and Beverly’s integration. Regular feedback sessions with the team can help monitor the progress of the new strategies (Bass, 1985).
• Contingency Plan: If initial strategies do not yield desired improvements, consider more structured conflict resolution interventions, such as mediation or temporary project reassignments (McCleskey, 2014). Further, a coaching or mentoring program might be established for Beverly to directly address her interpersonal dynamics.

Conclusion

Adopting transformational leadership can significantly improve the dynamics between Wanda and Beverly by fostering an environment of respect, recognition, and personal development. This approach not only addresses the immediate conflicts but also enhances the overall team’s cohesion and productivity.

References

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Case 45. The worst part was that she was often right. (n.d.). In Fifty Case Studies for Management & Supervisory Training, 45.1–45.3.

Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.

McCleskey, J.A. (2014). Situational, transformational and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117–130. Download the pdf.

Note:
This article is written based on University of The People Leading in Today’s Dynamic Context (BUS 5411) written assignment by Fristy Tania in April 2024